For most Arc A750 owners, the B570 is not a worthwhile upgrade on performance alone: reviews put it only around 10–15% faster at 1080p, with a smaller gap at 1440p. It makes sense only if you can sell your A750 and cover most of the cost, if you need the extra 2 GB of VRAM, or if you want a cooler, quieter card that draws about 75 W less.
The B570 is the better card for someone buying fresh today. But “better card to buy new” and “worth replacing a working A750” are different questions. This guide focuses on the second one.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Our Top Picks
Top 3 picks at a glance
Alchemist to Battlemage: What Changes on Paper
| Specification | Arc A750 (your current card) | Arc B570 (the upgrade) |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Xe-HPG Alchemist (Gen 12.7) | Xe2-HPG Battlemage |
| Release date | 12 October 2022 | 16 January 2025 |
| Launch MSRP | $289 | $219 |
| Shader units | 3,584 | 2,304 |
| Boost clock | 2,400 MHz | 2,500 MHz |
| Process node | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| VRAM | 8 GB GDDR6 | 10 GB GDDR6 |
| Memory bus | 256-bit | 160-bit |
| Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | 380.0 GB/s |
| L2 cache | 16 MB | 9 MB |
| TDP | 225 W | 150 W |
| PCIe interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Slot width | 2-slot | 2-slot |
| Display outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DP 2.0 | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DP 2.1 |
Look closely and the B570 appears to be a downgrade in several rows: fewer shaders, a narrower bus, less bandwidth and less L2 cache. The reason it still wins is architectural. Battlemage executes work far more efficiently per shader, handles its memory better and fixes many of the utilization problems that held Alchemist back. That is why fewer, faster units deliver more frames.
Real-World Uplift by Resolution
1080p
TechPowerUp’s B570 reviews found the card faster than the Arc A770, Alchemist’s flagship, at 1080p, and about 27% faster than the Arc A580. The A750 sits between those two cards, so the B570’s lead over it works out to roughly 10–15% in a typical modern game suite. KitGuru’s results are consistent with that picture, with the B570 landing between the A750 and A770 in some titles and level with the A770 in others.
In approximate terms, a game running at 60 FPS on your A750 at 1080p high will typically land around 66–70 FPS on the B570. That is noticeable on a frame counter, but hard to feel in many games. Results shift with settings, CPU and driver version.
1440p
The A750’s 256-bit bus and 512 GB/s bandwidth help it at higher resolutions, so the B570’s lead shrinks at 1440p and can disappear in bandwidth-heavy games. Where the B570 can still win is in titles that exceed 8 GB of VRAM: there, its extra 2 GB prevents the stutter and texture pop-in that hit the A750.
Ray tracing
Battlemage’s ray tracing units are improved over Alchemist’s, and reviews show the B570 gaining somewhat more in RT workloads than in pure raster. Even so, neither card is built for heavy RT. Expect light RT effects with XeSS upscaling at 1080p on either.
Feature Set: Less Different Than You’d Think
One of the best things about staying with Intel is that your A750 already supports most of the same software features:
- XeSS 2 Super Resolution: supported on both.
- XeSS Frame Generation and Xe Low Latency: supported on both Alchemist and Battlemage in compatible games.
- AV1 encoding: both have hardware AV1 encode for streaming and recording.
So unlike moving from an older NVIDIA or AMD card to a new generation, you are not unlocking an exclusive upscaler or frame generation tier. The upgrade is mostly about raw performance per watt, a little more VRAM and improved driver behavior, since Battlemage tends to run new games more consistently out of the box.
Power, Heat and Your PSU
The power reduction is the B570’s most tangible benefit for A750 owners. Using GPU TDP + CPU + about 150 W headroom with a 90 W-class CPU:
- A750: 225 + 90 + 150 = roughly 465 W
- B570: 150 + 90 + 150 = roughly 390 W
That 75 W TDP cut means less heat dumped into the case and quieter fans under load. TechPowerUp measured the B570 averaging around 155 W in its 1080p gaming tests, close to its rated figure. If your A750 runs on a quality 550 W unit, the B570 will be comfortable there with extra headroom. You also drop from two PCIe connectors (6-pin plus 8-pin) to a single 8-pin, which simplifies cable management.
Fitting It In Your Case
Both are dual-slot cards. The reference B570 measures 272 mm long; partner designs vary from compact dual-fan versions to larger triple-fan models. If your A750 fits, a dual-fan B570 almost certainly will, but check the specific model’s length against your case’s GPU clearance.
The PCIe x8 Question
Your A750 uses a full x16 link; the B570 uses x8. On a PCIe 4.0 motherboard this makes little difference in practice. On a PCIe 3.0 board, the B570 gets half the bus bandwidth of the A750, which can cost performance when a game spills out of VRAM. If you are on an older Intel 9th/10th-gen or AMD B450 system, factor that in. Resizable BAR remains essential for both cards, so if your A750 is already running well, that box is ticked.
CPU Overhead: Check Before You Buy
Hardware Unboxed documented that Intel’s Battlemage cards lose more performance than equivalent NVIDIA or AMD cards when paired with older or slower CPUs. With a Ryzen 5 2600, Ryzen 5 3600 or similar, the B570’s small lead over the A750 can shrink further or vanish in CPU-heavy games. If your CPU is from that era, a CPU upgrade will likely do more for your frame rates than this GPU swap.
Driver Maturity and Day-One Game Support
Alchemist’s early driver problems are well documented, and Intel spent much of 2023 and 2024 fixing performance in older DirectX 9 and DirectX 11 titles. Those fixes carry over to the A750 today, so the gap in game compatibility between the two generations is much smaller than it was at launch. Battlemage benefits from that groundwork and from a design that maps more naturally to how modern games issue work, so new releases generally run more predictably on day one. If you have been frustrated by occasional glitches or poor performance in specific games on your A750, it is worth checking whether those titles behave better on Battlemage before buying, since that could matter more to you than the average frame rate gain.
Upgrade Math: What Does the Gain Really Cost?
Here is a worked example using broad market ranges. A used A750 typically sells for roughly $120–$160. Suppose you buy a B570 around its $219 MSRP and sell your A750 for about $140:
- Net upgrade cost: about $219 − $140 = ~$80
- Performance gain at 1080p: roughly 10–15%
- Cost per percentage point of gain: roughly $5–$8 per 1%
Compare that with a bigger jump, such as moving to a card 50–70% faster for a net cost of $250–$300: that works out to around $4–$6 per 1%, while delivering an upgrade you will actually feel. The B570 swap is cheap in absolute terms but poor value per frame gained.
Should You Upgrade? Quick Verdict Table
| Your situation | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| A750 runs fine, 1080p, no VRAM complaints | Keep the A750 |
| Hitting 8 GB limits in newer games | B570 helps, but a 12 GB+ card helps more |
| Small case, heat or noise issues | B570 is a sensible swap |
| PSU at its limit or only one PCIe lead | B570 solves it |
| Older CPU (Ryzen 2000/3000, Intel 9th gen) | Upgrade CPU first |
| Want a big jump at 1440p | Skip the B570; look at B580 or higher-tier cards |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much faster is the Arc B570 than the Arc A750?
Roughly 10–15% at 1080p, based on TechPowerUp and KitGuru review data. At 1440p the gap narrows because the A750 has a wider 256-bit memory bus. The B570 pulls further ahead only in games that exceed 8 GB of VRAM.
Does the Arc A750 support XeSS frame generation?
Yes. XeSS 2, including Frame Generation and Xe Low Latency, works on both Alchemist and Battlemage cards in supported games. Upgrading to the B570 does not unlock an exclusive upscaling feature.
Is the Arc B580 a better upgrade from the A750?
It is a more meaningful one. TechPowerUp measured the B580 around 15% ahead of the B570, and it has 12 GB of VRAM. That makes the jump from an A750 more noticeable, especially at 1440p.
Will the B570 lower my power bill?
Slightly. Its 150 W TDP is 75 W lower than the A750’s 225 W. At three hours of gaming a day, that saves around 80 kWh per year, which at typical electricity prices is a modest but real amount.
Do I need to change anything in the BIOS when switching to the B570?
If your A750 was already running correctly, Resizable BAR should be enabled, and the B570 needs it too. Use DDU or a clean driver install when swapping cards. Updating to the latest Intel graphics driver is recommended for Battlemage support.
